Every contract starts with an offer or proposal. A proposal must be made by one party and accepted by the other in order for a contract to be enforceable. Proposals, their communication, acceptance, and revocation are governed by the Indian Contract Act of 1872. Understanding Sections 2(a) and Section 3 through 8 is very crucial for law students since they define what constitutes a proposal, when it is conveyed, how it can be rescinded, and how acceptance occurs. These clauses are formally placed under the Act’s “Communication, Acceptance and Revocation of Proposals” chapter.
The definition is an
offer, its fundamental components, communication, revocation, general and
specific offers, significant examples, and leading case laws are all covered in
this article.
TABLE OF CONTENT
- WHAT IS AN OFFER OR PROPOSAL?
- ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF A VALID OFFER
- COMMUNICATION OF OFFER
- TYPES OF OFFERS
- COMMUNICATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF AN OFFER
- ACCEPTANCE BY CONDUCT – section 8
- REVOCATION OF OFFER
- MODES OF REVOCATION under section 6
- OFFER VS INVITATION TO OFFER
- IMPORTANT CASE LAWS ON OFFER
- CONCLUSION
WHAT IS AN OFFER OR
PROPOSAL?
According to Section 2(a)
of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a proposal is made when one person indicates
to another that he is willing to do something or refrain from doing something
in order to get the other person’s consent. To put it simply, an offer is a
person’s readiness to engage into a legal partnership with another on certain
terms, with the hope that the other person will accept it. The offeror or
proposer is the person who makes the offer, while the offeree is the person to
whom the offer is made.
ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF A
VALID OFFER
Certain conditions must
be met for an offer to have legal significance.
1-The offer must show an
intention to create legal relations –
The purpose of the offer must be to establish
a legal obligation. For instance, if A tells his friend, “I will take you out
for dinner tomorrow,” this is typically considered a social agreement rather
than a contractual commitment. However, because it refers to a business
transaction, A’s statement, “I will sell you my phone for 20,000,” might be
considered an offer.
2- The offer must be
certain and definite –
An offer’s conditions
should be properly explicit. For instance –
Acceptable: “I’ll give
you my motorcycle for 70,000.”
Uncertain: “I’ll give you
a fair price for my motorcycle.”
Unless the surrounding
conditions offer an objective basis for calculating the price, the second
statement can be excessively ambiguous.
3- The offer must be
communicated -
A person who is not aware
of an offer cannot accept it. Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt is a well-known case
that established this element. In this instance, a servant was dispatched to
look for the missing nephew of his master. When the servant discovered the
nephew, he was not aware of the reward that had been announced. The court
decided that as he has carried out the deed without being aware of the offer,
he was not entitled to the award.
Principle: Before
accepting an offer, one must be aware of it. A person cannot, therefore, accept
an offer that he was unaware of.
4- The offer must be made
with a view to obtaining assent-
An offer does not always follow
from a simple declaration of intent. For instance- “Next month, I plan to sell
my car.” This just conveys an intention. It doesn’t always encourage
acceptance. Conversely: “I’d like to sell my car for 5 lakhs.” This shows that
you intend to get the other person’s consent.
5- Under Section 9,
promises may be expressed or implied -
Promises may be made
explicitly or implicitly. An express offer might be made verbally or in
writing. An implicit offer is deducted from actions or situations. For instance
– when a bus is run seeking passengers, the operator’s actions may be
interpreted as an implicit offer to transport people in accordance with the
relevant terms and fare.
COMMUNICATION OF OFFER
Section 3 and 4 include
the majority of the communication guidelines.
Section 3: Communication
of proposals – According to Section 3, a proposal, acceptance, or revocation
may be communicated by an act or omission that is meant to communicate it or
that has the effect of communicating it. Thus, communication can occur through
words, writing, conduct, electronic communication, other acts having the effect
of communicating the proposal.
Section 4: When is an
offer fully communicated? Section 4 states that a proposal is considered fully
communicated when the recipient is aware of it. For instance – A writes to B
with an offer. When B receives the letter and learns about it, the offer is
communicated. As a result, just sending the offer does not guaranty that it has
been shared.
TYPES OF OFFERS
Offers fall into a variety
of areas. General offers and specific offers are two particularly significant
categories.
1- Specific
offer -
A unique offer is given
to a specific individual or group of individuals. Generally speaking, only the
person or people to whom the offer is made may accept it. For instance, A
informs B: “I’ll sell you my car for 6 lakhs.” B is the target of this specific
offer. Since the offer was made especially to B, C cannot normally accept it if
C finds out about it and declares, “I accept your offer.”
Case law: Boulton vs
Jones – In Boulton vs Jones, an offer was made to one person, and after
acquiring the relevant firm, another person tried to accept it. The case serves
as an example of the idea that a specific offer is meant for the recipient.
2- General
offer -
An offer presented to the
general is known as a general offer. Anybody who meets the requirements
outlined in the offer may accept it. For instance, A states that: “Anyone who
finds and returns my lost dog will receive a reward of 10,000.” Since the
general population is the target audience, this is a general offer. The award
is available to anyone who is aware of the offer and fulfils its requirements.
Carlill vs Carbolic Smoke
Ball co. case – Carlill vs Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1893) is one of the most
well-known cases involving general offers. In its advertisement, the business promised
to pay £100 to anyone who used its smoke ball as directed but nevertheless got
the flu. In order to prove its genuineness, the corporation said that it had deposited
£1,000 with a bank. Mrs. Carlill claimed the incentive after getting the
illness after using the smoke ball as instructed. According to the court, the
advertisement was a generic offer made to the public, which Mrs. Carlill
accepted by fulfilling its requirements. The case demonstrated that an offer
may be given to the general public in a suitable situation, and acceptance may
take place by fulfilling its requirements.
COMMUNICATION OF
ACCEPTANCE OF AN OFFER
A contract is not created
by an offer alone. The law must embrace it. According to Section 2(b), a
proposition is deemed accepted when the person to whom it is made indicates his
assent. Additionally, Section 7 mandates that acceptance be unqualified and
absolute. For instance – For Rs. 20,000, A offers to sell B his phone. B
states: “Your offer of Rs. 20,000 is accepted.” This is a complete acceptance.
However, if B states: I’ll pay Rs. 17,000 for it.” This is not a sign of
approval. The offer is a counter offer.
ACCEPTANCE BY CONDUCT –
section 8
According to Section 8,
fulfilling the terms of a proposal or accepting the consideration included with
it may be considered acceptance. In situations involving generic offers, this
clause is very crucial. For instance – A declares: “Anyone who returns my lost
dog will receive Rs. 5000.” B locates and returns my lost dog after learning
about the offer. If B fulfils the requirement, the offer may be considered
accepted. Carlill vs Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. is another example of this idea.
REVOCATION OF OFFER
An offer doesn’t stay
open forever. Section 5 and 6 of the Indian Contract Act provide revocation
guidelines. Section 5 states revocation prior to acceptance. A proposal may be
withdrawn under section 5 at any point prior to the proposer being fully
informed of its acceptance, but not after. For instance – A sends B a letter
offering to sell his house. B announces his approval. According to the
statutory postal rule outlined in Section 5, once B posts the acceptance, A’s
ability to withdraw the proposal expires because, at that point, notification
of acceptance is complete against A.
MODES OF REVOCATION under section 6
Section 6 states that an
offer may be withdrawn in the following ways:
1- By
sending out a notice of revocation – If the offer is retracted, the offeror may
notify the offeree. For instance – A proposes to sell B his automobile for Rs.
5 lakhs. Before B agrees, A informs B: “I’m withdrawing my offer,” The offer
has been withdrawn. However, simply choosing to withdraw the offer in secret is
insufficient; the offeree must be informed of the revocation.
2- By
lapse of prescribed or reasonable time – An offer may be expired when the time
given for acceptance ends. If no time is given, offer may expire after a
reasonable period has passed. Example – A offers to sell flowers to B and asks
B to accept immediately. If B tries to accept after several days, the offer may
have expired depending on the situation.
3- By
failure to fulfil the condition precedent – An offer may be revoked if the
person accepting fails to meet a condition that must be fulfilled before accepting.
Example – A offers to sell certain goods to B on a condition that B pays Rs.
10,000 before accepting. If B does not meet this condition, the offer may
expire.
4- By
death or insanity of proposer – Under section 6, an offer is revoked if the
proposer dies or becomes insane, and this fact is known to the person receiving
the offer before acceptance occurs. Therefore, mere death or insanity is not
enough under this rule, the fact must be known to the offeree before acceptance
OFFER VS INVITATION TO
OFFER
In contract law, it is
important to understand the difference between an offer and an invitation to
offer. An invitation to offer is simply a way of asking people to make offers. Example
to invitation to offer – goods displayed in a shop, price list, catalogues,
most advertisements, auction notices. For instance – If a shirt is displayed in
a shop shelf with a price tag, it is usually an invitation for customers to
make an offer, not an offer itself. This principle was recognised in the Pharmaceutical
Society of Great Britain vs Boots Cash Chemist Ltd.
IMPORTANT CASE LAWS ON
OFFER
1- Lalman
Shukla vs Gauri Datt (1913)
FACTS – Gauri Datt’s
nephew went missing. He sent his servant, Lalman Shukla, to search for the boy
and gave him money for travel. After Lalman began searching for the boy, Gauri
Datt put up posters offering a reward of Rs. 501 for anyone who found his
nephew. Lalman found the boy and returned him, but he did not know about the
reward when he did so. Later, after learning about the reward, he asked Gauri
Datt for the money.
ISSUE – Was Lalman Shukla
entitled to the reward even though he was unaware of the offer when he found
the missing boy?
JUDGEMENT – The Allahabad
High Court ruled that Lalman was not entitled to reward. The court explained that
Lalman did not know about the reward when he searched for and found the boy. Therefore,
his act could not be seen as acceptance of the offer. He was acting on his employer’s
instruction, not in response to the reward.
2- Boulton
vs Jones (1857)
FACTS – A company held by
man named Brocklehurst was taken over by Boulton. Jones had a great commercial
relationship with Brocklehurst and had been one of his customers. Jones thought
he was dealing with Brocklehurst when he sent an order to the shop. But Boulton
had already taken control of the company when the order arrived. Jones received
the goods from Boulton in accordance with the order. Jones later declined to
pay Boulton, claiming that he had no intention of signing a contract with
Boulton.
ISSUE – If Jones had made
the offer thinking he was dealing with Brocklehurst, could Boulton still demand
payment from Jones?
JUDGEMENT – According to
the court, Bouton was unable to get the money back from Jones. Boulton was not
the target of Jones’s offer, Brocklehurst was. Boulton was not the intended
recipient of the offer, so he was unable to accept it and enter into a contract
with Jones.
3- Harvey
vs Facey (1893)
FACTS – In a telegram,
Harvey asked Facey: Will you sell Bumper Hall Pen to us? The lowest cash price
is telegraphed. Facey answered: “Bumper Hall Pen’s lowest price is £900.” After
that, Harvey sent another telegram: “We agree to pay £900 for the Bumper Hall
Pen.” Facey declined to sell this property and failed to complete the transaction.
ISSUE – Whether Harvey
could accept Facey’s claim that the lowest price was £900.
JUDGEMENT – According to
the Privy Council, there was no legally enforceable agreement. Facey only
stated the price at which he was willing to sell when he said that £900 was the
lowest price. The offer to sell the home for £900 was not made. Because Facey
had not made an offer, Harvey’s subsequent reply stating “We agree to buy”
could not be interpreted as an acceptance of an offer.
4- Pharmaceutical
Society of Great Britain vs Boots Cash Chemist Ltd. (1953)
FACTS – A self-service
pharmacy was run by Boots Cash Chemist. Customers may browse the store, choose
medications from the shelves, and then bring them to the register. The
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain contended that some medication’s
placement on the shelves constituted an offer to buy. This was significant
since certain medications could only be lawfully sold under a registered pharmacist’s
supervision. In essence, the question was whether the customer’s purchase of
the medication off the shelf or the cashier’s acceptance of it at the counter constituted
the contract of sale.
ISSUE – Whether an offer
for sale was made when products were displayed were displayed on a self-service
store’s shelves and accepted when the customer picked them up.
JUDGEMENT – The Court of Appeal determined that the merchandise displayed on the shelves constituted an invitation to offer rather than an actual offer. The offer to buy was made by the customer when they brought the items to the cashier. That offer could subsequently be accepted or rejected by the cashier or shopkeeper. Therefore, rather than when the customer picked up the items from the shelf, the contract was made at the cashier’s counter.
CONCLUSION
To comprehend how a
contract is formed under the Indian Contract Act of 1872, one must grasp the
idea of an offer or proposal. The fundamental framework of offer and acceptance
is established by these provisions, which range from the definition of a
proposal under Section 2(a) to its notification and withdrawal under Section 3
to 6. Cases like Lalman Shukla vs Gauri Datt, Boulton vs Jones, Harvey vs
Facey, and Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain vs Boots Cash Chemists Ltd.
serve as an example of key concepts pertaining to pricing statements,
invitation to offer, communication of offers, and specific offers.
We hope this article helped
you understand the concept of offer/proposal in simple and exam-friendly language.
For more simplified notes, important case laws and legal concepts for law
students, explore more articles on LawVibes.
Keep learning, keep questioning,
and keep building your legal knowledge with LawVibes!
References
- The
Indian Contract Act, 1872, Act No. 9 of 1872,
Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India — particularly Sections
2(a), 2(b), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9.
India Code – The Indian Contract Act, 1872
- Lalman
Shukla v. Gauri Dutt, Civil Revision No. 10 of 1913,
decided on 17 April 1913, Allahabad High Court, 1913 40 ALJ 489.
- Boulton
v. Jones, (1857) 2 H & N 564; 157 ER
232.
- Harvey
v. Facey, [1893] AC 552, Privy
Council.
- Pharmaceutical
Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd.,
[1953] 1 QB 401; [1953] EWCA Civ 6.
BAILII – Pharmaceutical Society v. Boots Cash Chemists
6. 6. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.
(1893)
- Pollock
& Mulla, The Indian Contract and Specific Relief Acts,
LexisNexis.
- Avtar
Singh, Law of Contract and Specific Relief,
Eastern Book Company.
- R.K.
Bangia, Law of Contract, Allahabad Law
Agency.
- India
Code, Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and
Justice, Government of India — for the text of the Indian Contract Act,
1872.

Post a Comment